Education / Featured

Louisiana Teachers Union Threatens Voucher Schools with Litigation

PrintFriendly and PDF

Unprecedented tactic amounts to “bullying schools” that offer choice

In a stunning move, attorneys representing the Louisiana Association of Educators (LAE) have threatened litigation against schools participating in the state’s voucher program.

The LAE recently filed suit, arguing that the voucher program is unconstitutional. The suit is currently pending in the 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The union’s request for an injunction was denied on July 10.

On Wednesday, the LAE’s attorney, Brian F. Blackwell, of Blackwell & Associates in Baton Rouge, sent letters to each of the schools that have elected to participate in the state’s voucher program. In the letter, Blackwell claims that any school participating in the voucher program would be receiving “an unconstitutional payment of public funds.”

The letter goes on to insist that each school inform the Department of Education that it will not accept funding through the voucher program until the legal challenge has been resolved. Failure to do so by Friday, July 27 at 4:00 P.M. will result in the union instituting litigation against the school.

Clint Bolick, Vice President for Litigation at the Goldwater Institute in Arizona, has argued and won landmark cases in state and federal court on behalf of school choice programs around the nation. “In over two decades of school choice advocacy, I’ve never seen thuggery of this magnitude. What the unions can’t accomplish in the courtroom, they’re trying to achieve through bullying schools whose only offense is offering educational opportunities to children who need them.”

While it has become commonplace for unions to challenge state school choice programs on constitutional grounds, threatening the schools that offer to accept voucher students appears to be unprecedented.

“In my 16 years of promoting school choice, I have never seen a more brazen attempt to stop parents from selecting the school they think is best for their children,” said Robert Enlow, president and CEO of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. “The teachers union and their allies have sunk to a new low in their attempt to put the interests of the system ahead of the interests of parents. I hope the public will see this action for what it is: a blatant strong-arm tactic to threaten parents and non-public schools.”

The letter can be read in its entirety here. The name of the school has been redacted.

Tags: , , , ,
  • bennyzr

    Mafia tactics. These tactics should be illegal. This is why recipients of any money should never have a say in the disbursement of the money. Education dollars should have always followed the child and not the schools and unions. We now have a beast that wants will always want more. Starve the beast to kill it. This public money is our hard earned tax dollars and only the payers should decide where it goes.

  • red47

    This ought to be interesting.  Louisiana.  I wonder which side owns that judge.

  • Please just be aware that there are many, many folks on the left who also decry such tactics.

  • Jonathan Smith

    Parents should have full authority to select the perfect private school for their children. Teachers or schools have no right to influence their choice. School authorities must pay attention to the education provided in their school. It will automatically attract parents and students.